Secure every application with flexible pentesting that combines expert-led testing, autonomous validation, and actionable results.
Learn moreIdentify exploitable risk across external networks, internal infrastructure, and cloud environments.
Learn moreExtend your offensive security program with specialized assessments, adversarial testing, code review, and program-level support.
Learn moreThe most prevalent vulnerabilities, how macroeconomic trends impact security teams, and where you might be leaving money on the table with your pentests.
Disruption, transformation, volatility — whichever keyword fits your style, it all points to one fact: change is the constant for security teams.
How do security teams plan to protect assets with fewer resources and more responsibilities?
Cobalt's 5th edition of The State of Pentesting explores this question, tapping into data from 3,100 pentests and over 1,000 responses from security practitioners in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Here's What You'll Learn:
This is a type of injection attack. Any feature that allows user input can be vulnerable because it gives attackers an opportunity to inject and store malicious scripts into web applications. The next time a user pulls up data that includes the attacker’s input, their browser attempts to run the malicious code.
Using outdated software versions can leave you vulnerable to serious attacks, such as remote code execution with the recently discovered Log4j flaw. If you don’t have the latest version of Apache’s logging software, you have a vulnerability in your systems described as “a severe risk” by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. And this is one of thousands of examples.
IDOR can give access to resources via user-supplied input when attackers modify a value of a parameter that points directly to an object in your database. This flaw has the potential to give attackers access to personally identifiable information, which later enables identity theft, fraud, or blackmailing.
Security headers can help mitigate different attacks, such as Clickjacking, XSS, and encryption-related downgrade attacks. They can also strengthen privacy by enabling users to use their browsers’ security features such as disabling access to their webcam or microphone. Missing these configurations puts your operations and customers at risk.
If teams use the SSL or TLS 1.1 protocols, their encryption is not secure. Attackers with a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) position can break into older secure communication channels and attempt to decrypt the information. Some configurations also allow an attacker to downgrade communication from a stronger cipher suite to one that they can crack.
This is a type of injection attack. Any feature that allows user input can be vulnerable because it gives attackers an opportunity to inject and store malicious scripts into web applications. The next time a user pulls up data that includes the attacker’s input, their browser attempts to run the malicious code.
Using outdated software versions can leave you vulnerable to serious attacks, such as remote code execution with the recently discovered Log4j flaw. If you don’t have the latest version of Apache’s logging software, you have a vulnerability in your systems described as “a severe risk” by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. And this is one of thousands of examples.
IDOR can give access to resources via user-supplied input when attackers modify a value of a parameter that points directly to an object in your database. This flaw has the potential to give attackers access to personally identifiable information, which later enables identity theft, fraud, or blackmailing.
Security headers can help mitigate different attacks, such as Clickjacking, XSS, and encryption-related downgrade attacks. They can also strengthen privacy by enabling users to use their browsers’ security features such as disabling access to their webcam or microphone. Missing these configurations puts your operations and customers at risk.
If teams use the SSL or TLS 1.1 protocols, their encryption is not secure. Attackers with a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) position can break into older secure communication channels and attempt to decrypt the information. Some configurations also allow an attacker to downgrade communication from a stronger cipher suite to one that they can crack.